Critical Thinking At A Bachelor Degree Level

The Evangelical Republican Nightmare

In Uncategorized on January 23, 2012 at 1

Four years later and Evangelicals are back to square one, they do not have a solid Republican candidate to back.  Where is Karl Rove when you need him?

Thankfully four remain and we can all get over the fantastical notion that any of them (sans Santorum) really are as conservative as they gleefully proclaim on the trail.  At the moment, they will say anything they can to become the nominee and then make a sweeping shift to the center to reign in independents so that they can proclaim that they ended the worst presidency ever.

Personally, I was over this whole Evangelical political charade early into the second Bush term.  Too many promises, too many broken and feeling quite used after.  In the end, politics and religion really do not mix well.  The Evangelical idea that we can get “God’s chosen” into the White House and all will be well is complete idiocy.

So here are my thoughts on the remaining candidates:

Mitt Romney

He has worked very hard to make everyone forget that it was only four years ago he lost, badly, to John McCain.  He wants all of us to forget that he supported Romneycare; that he has flip-flopped on every issue under the sun; that he has a ton of money; that he hasn’t been successful in any major political office; he just wants us to forget.

He has worked very hard to follow President Obama’s playbook, guarded, on message and no leaks from his initial campaign.  Yes, he has worked very hard to create a sequel to a very bad movie to hope that we all forget that this is still the same man that noone liked then and really don’t like now.

As you can tell, I don’t like Romney.

Rick Santorum

What can you say about Rick?  The only reason he is still standing is because he drew the last straw of the conservatives in Iowa and happened to win.  Being under the radar was a good thing for him and I can’t imagine how many times he has thanked God for being placed on the end during those debates.

While the guy has the most conservative record, he is also the most ideologically goofy.  To list the silly notion that radical Islam was the sole reason for 9/11 and to completely disregard very smart analysis by Ron Paul that Bin Laden would wage a war against Western Orientalism shows how ignorant Santorum is to sociological research on this subject.

I couldn’t take him seriously in the beginning of the campaign and honestly can’t now.  Getting someone like that into office would be Obama in reverse and we simply can’t have another person come in on the far right who will ostracize the entire Democratic base, creating another stalemate of political activity.

Nope, not a fan.

Ron Paul

Paul has been the consistent “Libertarian acting as a Republican” voice in the race.  In many cases, he talks and makes so much sense that you wonder why he isn’t taken more seriously; and then other times, he talks and sounds so senile that you wish he would just retire.  He is this year’s Ross Perot.

He has been able to do what many other candidates could not, pull from the left to the right based on a myriad of political stances (anti-war, anti-interventionist, removing government from most things).  If Paul doesn’t win the nomination, expect an increase in Libertarian membership.

To me, Paul comes off as a pipe-dream candidate.  You think, it would be nice to do everything he is stating but the consequences of a one term Paul presidency would be devastating for the country, much less the world.  Like it or not, we are in a global world now; by pulling out in the ways that Paul suggests, we would devastate other nations by simply not being present either militarily or fiscally.  If there is one way to start a war, that would be one.

While I appreciate Paul and many of his logical approaches, I feel he simply wouldn’t be able to bring serious solutions or be able to work with a Congress that has too many pet projects that Paul would want to abolish.

Newt Gingrich

Evangelicals like my friend, Matthew Lee Anderson, are pretty much stating that Gingrich winning South Carolina is the end of many moralistic views.  I guess Gingrich must represent some form of modernity within the Republican party that makes them just cringe.

Gingrich is far from perfect.  However, to state that you wouldn’t support Gingrich because of his past marriage issues would pretty much disqualify a good chunk of our current pastorates, many of our church leaders and overall half of the Evangelical church in regards to divorce.

Is it any worse that Romney blatantly lies about his flip-flops or spins how Bain made their money?  They are all politicians, attempting to say anything to win your vote.  If we were voting on a purity scale, Paul and Santorum are definitely better in that category.

With Gingrich, I will admit that while I find his past unappealing, I also find my own in the same light.  I am not voting for a person who will best be able to fill the role of  Jesus Christ, Superstar; I am voting for a person that I feel can actually make considerable change in DC.  In that regard, Gingrich has a record of being able to work with Democrats (aka Bill Clinton) to get good bills passed.

Now, when Gingrich gets into some of his grandiose ideas, I simply shake my head.  Stick with what you know you can accomplish and you should be good.

I believe Gingrich has bucked the trend of narrow-minded Republican approaches and can at least be more of a centrist in the long run.  Hence, why I currently support him.  That could all change in a day though, depending on what other truths come out.

If Romney became the Republican nominee, it would be very difficult for me to vote for him.  In fact, it would probably be his Vice Presidential candidate that pulls me in.  Otherwise, I may have to really research alternative party candidates.  Maybe you feel the same way.

Overall the Republican group of candidates are underwhelming and I wish that someone, anyone else would be running.  But until Americans demand better, this is what we get.  Pretty sad eh?

  1. It moved me…profound, at best!!!

  2. Great analysis, Ben. “Underwhelming” was definitely the right word. Just curious–who would you like to see run, ideally? Is there someone out there who fits the mold in your opinion, or do you just have an idea of what the person would look like?

    • I would be happy if Hillary Clinton ran simply because I think she is a proven leader (with a lot of baggage) but she has been an excellent Sec. of State. But ideally, Chris Christie is my favorite person who I would love to see run. He is honest, tells it like it is and doesn’t filter things through focus groups. Condoleeza Rice would be another but beyond the pickings are slim. Everything is media made now, which is sad.

  3. “The Evangelical idea that we can get “God’s chosen” into the White House and all will be well is complete idiocy.”

    That is the most important line of this article. And most evangelicals still won’t get it.

    Maybe we need to wake up to the fact that “judgment begins with God’s house” and when the salt has lost its savour it is useless and needs to be thrown out.

    While we fight to to stop homosexual marriages, etc. we wink at divorce and remarriage in our midst; while we fight against abortion, we ignore torture and the slaughter a women and children in war.

    I believe that this current judgment has only begun.

    • Well, I tend to look at other alternatives than using the word judgment. I believe we should turn to prayer and encourage others into Christ.

      From my experience, using judgment to explain what God is doing opens you up to disregard of His love and creating a filter that allows for a negative perception to not only exist in you but also be sensed by others.

      I just feel some of the edgier terms need to be sanded down also. Just my thought.

    • On another note, your photography is quite stellar. Great vision in capturing the moment.

    • Ben is absolutely right:

      Your photography is stellar.

    • I am curious though…what exactly you think is the “judgment” that is happening right now. I’m not sure I follow your point, particularly in regards to those things that you claim we tolerate.

      Are you saying that we are seeing judgment BECAUSE we tolerate those things?

      Or are you saying that those things we tolerate ARE THE JUDGMENT?

      Or…something entirely different?

      As for “God’s chosen” in the White House…yes and no. Is there going to be a great Christian leader in the White House? Someone who will do exactly what many evangelicals want him to do? Probably not. But…it is God who appoints kings and leaders and–I daresay–presidents. Christians can rest in that knowledge. He is, after all, still sovereign.

      Pax!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 762 other followers

%d bloggers like this: